By JUAN PABLO ROJAS PASCUAL | ROJAS PASCUAL – Abogados: Argentine attorney focused on the legal structuring and design of Autonomous Companies, AI-Automated Companies, Argentina Citizenship by Investment, and related international legal matters.

Argentina Citizenship by Investment: What Law 346 Provides for Investment-Based Naturalization.

Direct Answer:

Argentina’s Citizenship Law No. 346 provides the legal foundation for citizenship by investment as a specific route to naturalization. Under Article 2(2) of the current law, foreign nationals may qualify for naturalization, regardless of the length of their residence in Argentina, if they can demonstrate that they have made a relevant investment in the country.

Article 2 bis gives the Ministry of Economy authority to determine which investments qualify as relevant for this purpose. Article 6 assigns the granting of the naturalization certificate to the National Directorate of Migration (Dirección Nacional de Migraciones — DNM), while Articles 6 bis, 6 ter and 6 quater establish the institutional framework for Argentina’s Citizenship by Investment programs.

The legal framework should therefore be understood as a system: Law No. 346 establishes the statutory basis for investment-based naturalization, while subsequent regulations and administrative measures provide the framework necessary for its implementation.

Key Facts:

• Law No. 346 is the central Argentine citizenship statute and expressly provides for naturalization based on a relevant investment.

• Article 2(2) creates a naturalization route based on investment without imposing a specific prior residence period.

• Article 2 bis assigns the Ministry of Economy the authority to determine which investments qualify as relevant.

• The National Directorate of Migration remains responsible for granting the naturalization certificate.

• The 2025 reform created a dedicated Citizenship by Investment Agency with functions relating to the design, administration, evaluation and implementation of investment-based citizenship programs.

Introduction: Law No. 346 and Argentine Citizenship by Investment.

Argentina’s Citizenship by Investment framework does not derive from a single statute bearing the name «Citizenship by Investment Law.» Its legal foundation is found in Law No. 346 on Citizenship, whose provisions were substantially amended in 2025 to introduce investment-based naturalization as a distinct legal route.

This distinction is important for international investors and professional advisers. The Argentine system should not be approached merely as an immigration program or as an investment product. At its core, it is a citizenship and naturalization framework, supplemented by rules concerning investment and administrative procedure.

The 2025 reform introduced an additional route for foreign nationals seeking Argentine citizenship. Unlike the traditional naturalization route based on a period of residence, Article 2(2) allows a foreign national to seek naturalization by demonstrating a relevant investment in Argentina, regardless of the length of residence in the country.

The same reform also established a specific institutional architecture for Citizenship by Investment. This includes the Agency of Citizenship by Investment Programs, operating within the Ministry of Economy, as well as the continuing role of the National Directorate of Migration in the granting of naturalization.

For that reason, a proper legal analysis should begin with Law No. 346 and then distinguish between what the statute itself establishes, what was subsequently developed through executive regulations, and what depends on the specific rules applicable to an investment program.

What Is Law No. 346 and Why Does It Matter for Citizenship by Investment?

Law No. 346 is Argentina’s fundamental statute governing citizenship and naturalization. Originally enacted in 1869, it establishes different categories of Argentine citizenship and regulates, among other matters, the acquisition of citizenship through naturalization by foreign nationals.

The 2025 reform introduced relevant investment as an express basis for naturalization. Article 2 now provides for two distinct circumstances in which a foreign national may pursue Argentine citizenship through naturalization.

The first is the traditional residence-based route, which generally requires two years of continuous and lawful residence immediately preceding the application. The second is the investment-based route established by Article 2(2), which applies regardless of the length of the applicant’s residence in Argentina.

This distinction has practical and legal significance.

Argentine Citizenship by Investment should not simply be understood as a residence program followed by an accelerated naturalization process. The statute recognizes investment as a separate legal basis for naturalization.

At the same time, the existence of this statutory route does not mean that every investment made in Argentina qualifies for citizenship purposes. Article 2(2) expressly refers to a «relevant investment», and Article 2 bis delegates to the Ministry of Economy the authority to determine which investments will meet that standard.

Accordingly, Law No. 346 provides the legal foundation, but it must be read together with the subsequent regulatory and administrative framework governing its implementation.

Article 1 of Law No. 346: Who Is an Argentine Citizen by Origin?

Before addressing naturalization, it is important to understand the structure of Law No. 346 itself.

Article 1 belongs to the first section of the statute, dealing with Argentines by origin, and identifies the circumstances in which a person is considered Argentine under the statutory framework.

The provision principally reflects the territorial and origin-based rules of Argentine nationality. It includes persons born in Argentine territory, subject to the statutory exception concerning children of foreign diplomatic officials and members of foreign legations residing in Argentina.

Article 1 also covers other circumstances involving citizenship by origin, including certain children of native Argentines born abroad who opt for Argentine citizenship, persons born in Argentine legations or on Argentine warships, certain persons born in territories historically associated with the United Provinces of the Río de la Plata, and persons born in neutral waters under the Argentine flag.

Does Article 1 Establish Citizenship by Investment?

No.

Article 1 does not establish an investment-based route to Argentine citizenship. Its purpose is to identify the persons who fall within the statutory categories of Argentines by origin.

Citizenship by Investment is instead located within the naturalization framework beginning with Article 2.

This distinction is fundamental. A foreign investor seeking Argentine citizenship through the investment route does not qualify because of birth in Argentina or because of one of the circumstances addressed by Article 1. The potential acquisition of citizenship occurs through the statutory process of naturalization.

For international readers, this distinction can be expressed as the difference between citizenship or nationality by origin and naturalization through investment.

Article 1 therefore provides the conceptual starting point for understanding the statute, while Article 2 establishes the framework relevant to foreign nationals seeking citizenship through naturalization.

From Article 1 to Article 2: From Citizenship by Origin to Naturalization

The structure of Law No. 346 makes this distinction explicit.

The first part of the statute addresses Argentines by origin. The following section, beginning with Article 2, addresses citizens by naturalization.

That structure is particularly relevant when analyzing Argentina’s Citizenship by Investment framework.

An international investor does not enter the citizenship system through the provisions concerning Argentine citizenship by origin. Instead, the investor falls within the statutory category of a foreign national seeking naturalization and, specifically, within the investment-based ground established by Article 2(2).

Understanding this distinction helps avoid a common conceptual error: treating investment-based citizenship as though it were a form of citizenship by birth or origin. Under Argentine law, it is a naturalization route.

Article 2: Naturalization Through a Relevant Investment.

Article 2 of Law No. 346 establishes the statutory framework for Argentine citizenship by naturalization.

Its current wording provides two principal routes for foreign nationals.

The first is the residence-based route. Foreign nationals over eighteen who can demonstrate continuous and lawful residence in Argentina for the preceding two years and express their intention to become Argentine citizens may qualify under this provision.

The second route is the one directly relevant to Argentina Citizenship by Investment.

Article 2(2) provides that foreign nationals may qualify for naturalization, regardless of the length of their residence, if they demonstrate before the National Directorate of Migration that they have made a relevant investment in Argentina.

This provision is legally significant because it creates an investment-based ground for naturalization that is distinct from the ordinary residence requirement.

The statute does not merely shorten a residence period. It establishes a separate statutory circumstance in which an investment may serve as the basis for a naturalization application.

What Does «Relevant Investment» Mean Under Law No. 346?

The expression «relevant investment» is one of the key concepts in the statutory framework.

Law No. 346 recognizes the concept but does not itself establish a permanent catalogue of all investments that qualify.

That function is assigned to the Ministry of Economy by Article 2 bis.

The distinction is important. The statute establishes that a relevant investment can provide the legal basis for naturalization, but the applicant must still demonstrate that the particular investment falls within the category determined under the applicable regulatory framework.

In practical legal terms, there are therefore two separate questions:

First, does Argentine law recognize investment as a ground for naturalization?

Yes. Article 2(2) expressly does so.

Second, does the particular investment made by the applicant qualify as a «relevant investment» for purposes of the statute?

That question depends on the rules and determinations issued under Article 2 bis.

Consequently, the mere fact that a foreign national has invested capital or assets in Argentina does not, by itself, establish that the investment qualifies for citizenship purposes.

Article 2 bis: The Role of the Ministry of Economy

Article 2 bis provides the regulatory bridge between the statutory concept of relevant investment and the investment programs through which the framework is implemented.

The provision assigns the Ministry of Economy the authority to determine which investments are considered relevant for purposes of Article 2(2). It also allows the Ministry to establish specific investment projects for this purpose.

This delegation explains why a legal analysis of Argentina Citizenship by Investment cannot stop at Article 2.

The relevant question is not simply whether an applicant has transferred funds, acquired an asset or made an economic commitment in Argentina. The legally significant question is whether the investment satisfies the criteria established for a relevant investment under the applicable framework.

This also explains the relationship between Law No. 346 and the regulations and administrative measures that followed its reform.

The statute establishes the legal basis for investment-based naturalization. The competent authorities then develop the mechanisms through which that statutory route can operate.

Citizenship by Investment Is Not Automatic Citizenship.

The wording of Article 2 must be read together with the institutional and procedural provisions governing naturalization.

The law does not provide that making an investment automatically results in Argentine citizenship.

Instead, it recognizes investment as the basis for a particular route to naturalization, subject to the applicant demonstrating that the investment qualifies as relevant and satisfying the applicable legal and administrative requirements.

The distinction is fundamental:

The investment is the qualifying basis for this route to naturalization; it is not, by itself, the legal act that grants citizenship.

This means that a proper legal assessment of an application must consider more than the financial characteristics of the investment. It must also address how the investment is documented, whether it satisfies the applicable criteria, and how the naturalization procedure operates.

What Happened to Articles 3, 4 and 5 of Law No. 346?

Articles 3, 4 and 5 of Law No. 346 were repealed by Article 43 of Decree 366/2025, effective upon publication in the Official Gazette.

They therefore do not constitute operative provisions of the current citizenship framework and are not necessary for analyzing a Citizenship by Investment application under the current legal regime.

Article 6: Who Grants the Naturalization Certificate?

Article 6 is particularly important because it clarifies the institutional role of the National Directorate of Migration (DNM).

The provision establishes that foreign nationals who have fulfilled the applicable statutory conditions obtain a naturalization certificate, and assigns the granting of that certificate to the National Directorate of Migration.

Article 6 also provides for coordination between the DNM and the National Registry of Persons (RENAPER) so that the relevant citizenship information can be transmitted and the corresponding Argentine national identity document can be issued.

This provision is essential when examining the institutional structure created by the 2025 reform.

The creation of a specialized Citizenship by Investment Agency did not eliminate the role of the DNM in granting naturalization. Instead, the legislation establishes differentiated functions among the authorities involved.

The Agency has specific responsibilities concerning the receipt and assessment of Citizenship by Investment applications, while the DNM remains the authority responsible under Article 6 for granting the naturalization certificate.

This distinction is central to understanding the legal architecture of the program.

Articles 6 bis, 6 ter and 6 quater: The Citizenship by Investment Agency.

The 2025 reform did more than introduce relevant investment as a new basis for naturalization.

It also established a dedicated institutional structure for the design, administration, implementation and assessment of Citizenship by Investment programs.

That structure is primarily reflected in Articles 6 bis, 6 ter and 6 quater of Law No. 346.

These provisions should be read together.

Article 6 bis establishes the Agency itself. Article 6 ter defines its principal powers and responsibilities. Article 6 quater sets out the functions of its Executive Director.

Article 6 bis: Establishment of the Agency.

Article 6 bis creates the Agency of Citizenship by Investment Programs as a decentralized agency operating within the Ministry of Economy.

Its statutory purpose is to design, manage and control Citizenship by Investment programs in Argentina.

The provision also establishes that the Agency is headed by an Executive Director with the rank and hierarchy of an Undersecretary, appointed by the Executive Branch.

From an institutional perspective, this is significant.

The Argentine framework does not treat Citizenship by Investment solely as an individual naturalization application. The reform establishes an administrative structure specifically designed to develop and manage programs through which foreign investment may be connected with the naturalization route created by Article 2(2).

Article 6 bis was introduced by Article 40 of Decree 366/2025.

Article 6 ter: Powers of the Citizenship by Investment Agency.

Article 6 ter provides the Agency with a range of specific functions.

At a general policy level, the Agency is empowered to implement Citizenship by Investment programs intended to attract foreign capital to Argentina and encourage foreign direct investment.

It also has institutional and promotional responsibilities, including the publication of annual information concerning investments received through Citizenship by Investment programs, participation in promotional campaigns, and the ability to engage qualified personnel where necessary.

For an individual applicant, however, some of its most important powers are those concerning the administration and assessment of citizenship applications.

The Agency may receive applications for citizenship by investment and request reports from the National Directorate of Migration, the Financial Information Unit (UIF), and other public authorities, private entities or individuals as appropriate to a particular application.

It is also responsible for evaluating applications.

Finally, the Agency must submit a reasoned report to the National Directorate of Migration recommending approval or rejection of the application.

This is an important feature of the legal framework.

The Agency is not merely a promotional body. The statute gives it functions involving the receipt of applications, the collection of relevant information, the evaluation of applications and the preparation of a reasoned recommendation.

At the same time, those functions must be distinguished from the final authority to grant naturalization. The Agency evaluates and recommends; the statute does not provide that the Agency itself grants citizenship.

Article 6 ter also gives the Agency authority to issue the rules it considers necessary for its operation.

Article 6 quater: Powers of the Executive Director.

Article 6 quater establishes the powers and responsibilities of the Executive Director of the Agency of Citizenship by Investment Programs.

The Executive Director is responsible for the organization, direction and administration of the Agency and is entrusted with a range of institutional, legal, financial and administrative responsibilities.

These include the legal representation of the Agency, general management, financial and accounting administration, human resources, internal regulations and the proposal of the Agency’s organizational structure.

Several functions are particularly relevant to the Citizenship by Investment framework.

The Executive Director participates in the design of Citizenship by Investment programs intended to attract foreign capital, in measures aimed at increasing foreign investment, and in the evaluation of citizenship applications to ensure that the applicable procedures and requirements are properly implemented.

The Executive Director also participates in the development and implementation of policies concerning the dissemination of Citizenship by Investment programs.

Finally, the provision assigns the Executive Director a role in determining the investments necessary for the implementation of those programs.

This authority must be understood alongside Article 2 bis.

Article 2 bis assigns the Ministry of Economy the authority to determine which investments are considered relevant for purposes of naturalization and allows the Ministry to establish specific investment projects. The Agency, meanwhile, operates within the institutional framework created to design, manage and evaluate the programs.

The result is a system involving several distinct authorities and functions:

• the Ministry of Economy, in determining relevant investments under Article 2 bis;

• the Citizenship by Investment Agency, in designing, managing, implementing, receiving and evaluating applications within the program framework; and

• the National Directorate of Migration, which retains the statutory function of granting the naturalization certificate under Article 6.

Why Do Articles 6 bis, 6 ter and 6 quater Matter to International Investors?

These provisions demonstrate that Argentina’s Citizenship by Investment framework has a distinct administrative architecture.

The system is not structured on the basis that an investor makes a qualifying payment and automatically receives citizenship. Instead, the law establishes different institutional functions covering the determination of relevant investments, program design, application intake, evaluation, reporting and the eventual granting of naturalization.

For an international investor, this distinction is essential.

A qualifying investment and the granting of Argentine citizenship are legally separate matters.

The investment may establish eligibility for the relevant naturalization route, but the application remains subject to the legal and administrative framework governing naturalization.

It is equally important to distinguish between the existence of the statutory investment-based route and the operational characteristics of any particular investment program.

Law No. 346 establishes the legal basis and institutional structure. The specific characteristics of investment programs and their implementation must be assessed under the rules and official measures applicable at the relevant time.

What Does Law No. 346 Actually Establish for Argentina Citizenship by Investment?

Reading the provisions introduced or amended in 2025 together reveals a central feature of the Argentine framework:

Citizenship by Investment has an express statutory basis, but its implementation depends on a broader regulatory and administrative framework.

Law No. 346 recognizes relevant investment as an independent ground for naturalization and establishes the principal institutional authorities involved in administering that route.

This allows three separate legal questions to be distinguished:

1. Whether Argentine law recognizes investment as a basis for naturalization;

2. What investment qualifies as a relevant investment; and

3. How an individual application is evaluated and decided.

That distinction is particularly important when analyzing the framework from a legal rather than purely commercial perspective.

The Statute Establishes the Route — Not Automatic Citizenship.

Article 2(2) expressly recognizes investment as a ground for naturalization. However, it does not provide that the mere completion of an investment automatically results in Argentine citizenship.

The provision establishes a legal route through which a foreign national who has made a relevant investment may seek naturalization.

The subsequent institutional provisions reinforce this distinction by establishing a structure through which applications are received, assessed and processed.

For legal purposes, it is therefore more accurate to refer to naturalization through investment or citizenship by investment as a naturalization route than to suggest that citizenship follows automatically from the transfer of funds or completion of an investment.

This is not merely a question of terminology. It determines how an individual application should be assessed and prevents the economic component of the framework from being confused with the legal act of naturalization.

Relevant Investment Is a Legal Concept That Requires Regulatory Development.

Article 2 bis is equally important.

The statute establishes that the Ministry of Economy determines which investments qualify as relevant and may establish specific investment projects.

Accordingly, Law No. 346 establishes the general legal criterion, but it does not itself contain a permanent and exhaustive list of every investment that may qualify.

For an individual application, it is therefore necessary to identify not only Article 2(2), but also the rules and official measures that develop the concept of relevant investment and establish the conditions applicable to the relevant program.

This is particularly important in a recently established framework.

Investment amounts, instruments, procedures, documentation and other operational requirements must always be assessed according to the rules applicable at the time of the application rather than inferred solely from the existence of the statutory route.

The Law Distinguishes Investment Promotion from the Granting of Citizenship.

The institutional structure created by Articles 6 bis, 6 ter and 6 quater also reveals two dimensions of the framework.

On one side, the Agency has a public-policy role connected with attracting foreign capital and implementing Citizenship by Investment programs.

On the other, it has functions directly connected with the evaluation of individual applications and the preparation of reasoned reports.

This reflects the fact that the framework combines an investment-attraction policy with an individual administrative naturalization process.

For an applicant, the investment and the citizenship application should therefore not be treated as entirely separate matters.

The investment provides the economic basis for this route to naturalization, but its qualification, documentation and assessment form part of a broader legal process.

Multiple Authorities Mean That Applications Require an Integrated Legal Analysis.

Law No. 346 does not concentrate all relevant functions in one authority.

The framework distributes responsibilities among the Ministry of Economy, the Citizenship by Investment Agency and the National Directorate of Migration. Article 6 ter also expressly allows the Agency to request information from the UIF and other public or private entities as appropriate to an application.

This institutional structure has practical implications.

A legal assessment of a potential application should not be limited to asking whether the applicant can demonstrate that a particular investment was made.

It should also consider the documentation supporting the investment, the information that may be required during the administrative process, and compliance with the applicable legal and administrative conditions.

In other words, the statutory framework gives legal relevance to the documentation and evidentiary support underlying the application, not merely to the existence of an investment.

The 2025 Reform Should Be Read as a Legal System, Not as an Isolated Amendment.

The introduction of Citizenship by Investment did not result from a single provision operating independently.

The current framework reflects the amendment of Article 2, the incorporation of Article 2 bis, the replacement of Article 6 and the creation of Articles 6 bis, 6 ter and 6 quater.

These changes should therefore be understood together.

A rigorous legal reading should avoid two opposite conclusions.

The first would be to suggest that Argentina has no investment-based naturalization route because the framework requires further regulatory development.

The second would be to assume that any investment meeting a particular financial threshold automatically produces citizenship.

Neither position accurately reflects the statutory architecture.

The first overlooks the express investment-based naturalization route established by Law No. 346. The second overlooks the regulatory, institutional and administrative structure established by the same legal framework.

The more precise legal position is therefore the following:

Argentina has an express statutory route to naturalization based on relevant investment, but the application of that route depends on compliance with the conditions and procedures established by the broader legal and regulatory framework.

What Should Be Verified Before Assessing an Argentina Citizenship by Investment Application?

From the perspective of a potential applicant, Law No. 346 provides a useful framework for identifying the legal questions that should be addressed before treating an investment as suitable for citizenship purposes.

First, it is necessary to determine whether the proposed investment falls within the category of relevant investments established under Article 2 bis.

Second, the applicable investment program and its specific conditions must be identified, including the mechanism through which the investment is to be made and documented.

Finally, the application procedure, documentary requirements, potential governmental checks and other conditions applicable to the naturalization process should be reviewed.

This is particularly important for international investors, family offices, wealth advisers and foreign lawyers assessing the framework on behalf of a client.

The relevant question is not simply how much capital must be invested.

A proper legal assessment should also consider whether the investment, its structure, its source and the supporting documentation can be adequately demonstrated within the applicable legal framework.

Law No. 346 and Operational Regulations Are Not the Same Thing.

Law No. 346 should be understood as the statute establishing the legal basis for investment-based naturalization and its principal institutional structure.

It does not, however, contain every operational element required to process an individual application.

The delegation contained in Article 2 bis itself demonstrates that certain matters are intended to be determined by the competent authorities. Likewise, the powers granted to the Citizenship by Investment Agency permit the development and administration of programs within the statutory framework.

For this reason, any assessment of a specific application should distinguish carefully between three levels of regulation:

• what Law No. 346 establishes directly;

• what has subsequently been developed through decrees and other legal or administrative instruments; and

• the specific operational conditions applicable to the program in force at the relevant time.

This distinction is particularly important in a new regulatory framework, where subsequent official measures may supplement or clarify the rules applicable to applicants.

Conclusion: The Role of Law No. 346 in Argentina’s Citizenship by Investment Framework.

Law No. 346 is the essential starting point for any serious legal analysis of Argentina Citizenship by Investment.

Its importance extends beyond Article 2(2)’s recognition of relevant investment as a basis for naturalization. The 2025 reform also created a dedicated institutional framework for developing Citizenship by Investment programs, receiving and evaluating applications, and coordinating the involvement of the relevant authorities.

The Argentine system should therefore be understood as a legal framework composed of statutory rules, implementing regulations and administrative procedures, rather than as a simple investment transaction linked to the automatic acquisition of a passport.

For international investors and professional advisers, this distinction is critical.

A proper assessment begins with identifying the applicable legal basis, continues with an analysis of the proposed investment and its regulatory classification, and then considers the documentation and administrative procedure required for naturalization.

Argentina’s Citizenship by Investment framework remains an evolving area of law. Before making an investment or submitting an application, prospective applicants should verify the rules in force at the relevant time and obtain legal advice tailored to their particular circumstances.

Frequently Asked Questions About Law No. 346 and Argentina Citizenship by Investment.

Does Law No. 346 recognize citizenship by investment?

Yes. Article 2(2) establishes a naturalization route for foreign nationals who demonstrate that they have made a relevant investment in Argentina, regardless of the length of their residence in the country.

Does making an investment automatically grant Argentine citizenship?

No. Law No. 346 establishes investment as a basis for a particular naturalization route. The completion of an investment should not be confused with the automatic granting of citizenship.

Who determines which investments qualify as relevant?

Under Article 2 bis, the Ministry of Economy is responsible for determining which investments qualify as relevant for purposes of investment-based naturalization and may establish specific investment projects.

What is the role of the Citizenship by Investment Agency?

The Agency is responsible for functions that include designing, managing and implementing Citizenship by Investment programs, receiving and evaluating applications, obtaining relevant information and submitting a reasoned recommendation for approval or rejection to the National Directorate of Migration.

Which authority grants the naturalization certificate?

Article 6 of Law No. 346 assigns the granting of the naturalization certificate to the National Directorate of Migration (DNM) for foreign nationals who have fulfilled the applicable legal conditions.

Does Law No. 346 contain all the requirements for a Citizenship by Investment application?

No. The statute establishes the legal basis and institutional framework, but it delegates certain matters to the competent authorities, particularly the determination of relevant investments. A specific application must therefore be assessed under the complete set of rules and official measures applicable at the relevant time.

Legal Advice on Argentina Citizenship by Investment.

Argentina Citizenship by Investment requires an assessment that brings together citizenship law, immigration regulations, investment structure and documentary compliance.

At Rojas Pascual Abogados, we advise international investors and professional advisers who require Argentine legal counsel to assess a potential investment-based naturalization application, determine the legal framework applicable to an investment, and prepare the relevant documentation in accordance with the rules in force.

The information contained in this article is provided for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice for any particular case. Investment amounts, procedures, eligibility requirements, documentation and other applicable conditions may be amended, supplemented or clarified by subsequent official regulations.

Updated Text of Law No. 346

The updated version of Argentina’s Citizenship Law No. 346, including the amendments introduced by Decree 366/2025, can be consulted through the official website of the Government of Argentina.

Consult the updated text of Law No. 346 — Argentina.gob.ar

About the Author:

Juan Pablo Rojas Pascual is an Argentine attorney and founder of Rojas Pascual Abogados. His practice includes Argentine Citizenship by Investment, legal assistance to international investors and foreign nationals, corporate and technology law, and emerging legal structures for autonomous and AI-enabled companies.

He advises international clients and professional advisers seeking Argentine legal counsel in connection with investment, citizenship and other cross-border legal matters.

Dr. Juan Pablo Rojas Pascual
Attorney at Law — Mendoza, Argentina
ROJAS PASCUAL – Abogados. 

Argentine Legal Counsel for International Investors and Families